.. . . For example, Keynesian policies worked for quite awhile in the US, but contributed in a big way to the stagflation crisis of the 1970s.)> We seem to have some area of agreement here between you and BDL, which puts you (and he) in good company, but on the basis of an apparently flaky notion. If you take away the oil price spikes, how do you derive stagflation from Keynesian policy? If you think the government heated up the economy too much in the late 1960's, generating at the very least an increase in the price level, how does this translate into the 'stag' part of stagflation--low growth-- or to any kind of inflationary spiral? How do you get a spiral of inflation from a single shock to the price level? If this is all answered in the paper you sent me, just let me know and I'll plunge into it. If not, then . . .? > >I wish leftists wouldn't imitate the right's labeling of Marx as a prophet and his predictions as "prophecies." . . . >> Isn't this Marx's fault? He wasn't exactly inarticulate. <Marx's prediction of _relative_ >immiseration was very abstract,. . . > This reminds me of your contorted account of what Marx really meant by the DoP. >From these, Marx sounds downright misleading, unless you bite the bullet and admit that he said what he seems to have said and was simply wrong in certain non-trivial respects. < . . . Cheers, MBS
[PEN-L:83] RE: Re: Fwd:Winning Socialism
Max Sawicky Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:57:04 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"