> Dialectical materialists speak of thought mirroring, being a reflection of, >etc. matter in consciousness. This relationship has never been clear to me. Lenin >writes about perception and adopts the same mirroring imagery. This aspect of >traditional Marxism, at least dialectical materialism, is not discussed by Levins >at all. The Dialectical Biologist Richard Levins, Richard Lewontin Harvard University Press 1985 A book review by Danny Yee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Copyright © 1993 http://www.anatomy.usyd.edu.au/danny/book-reviews/ The Dialectical Biologist is a collection of essays on various aspects of biology. Richard Lewontin is a population geneticist and Richard Levins is an ecologist, and they are both world-famous within their fields. Here they are writing as Marxists (and dialectical materialists), and it is this that gives this book its unique perspective. It was by reading this book that I first came to an understanding of the dialectical method and attained some grasp of Marx and Engel's broader philosophy. Perhaps this is because my understanding of biology is better than my understanding of economics and political theory, or perhaps it is simply because Marx's writings are difficult to come to grips with and the commentary on them is so contentious. The essays are divided into three sections. The first is about evolution, and the three essays it contains are all attacks on the adaptionist, neo-Darwinian view of the subject. The essays are lucid and well argued (as one would expect from the author of The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change) but there is a bit of repetition between them (two of them were originally encyclopaedia articles on "Evolution" and "Adaption"). The second section, entitled "On Anlysis", contains a warning of the potential for misuse of the analysis of variance in genetics, the brilliantly funny parody "Isadore Nabi on the Tendencies of Motion" and an essay on the relationship between dialectics and reductionism which makes particular reference to community ecology. The third section, entitled "Science as a Social Product and the Social Product of Science", contains an eclectic collection of essays on the use of science and the effects of social factors on science. The essay titles are "Lysenkoism", "The Commoditization of Science", "Biology in the Third World", "Political Economy of Agricultural Research", "The Pesticide System", "Research Needs for Latin Community Health" and "What is Human Nature?". The essay on Lysenkoism was the one I found the most interesting; while not denying the scientific errors involved, it is concerned to explain the full complexities of the "affair", which are all too often ignored by those using it as a stick to beat Marxism with. The common feature of all the essays is respect for the complexities of social processes, scientific practice and the interaction between them. The conclusion is a short (around twenty page) general discussion on the philosophical foundations of science entitled "Dialectics". It is one of the best things I have ever read on the philosophy of science, and a worthy conclusion to a great book. The Dialectical Biologist is heartily recommended to anyone with an interest in biology or the philosophy of science. Louis Proyect (http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)
