In a message dated 7/12/00 4:48:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Originally, I'd say that Analytical Marxism was a kind of Marxism, one
responding to dissatisfaction with both the "orthodox" Marxism of the 2nd &
3rd Internationals and Althusserian structuralist Marxism. But combining
Marxist propositions with the narrow-minded method of orthodox mainstream
social science was like mixing oil and water, so the two parted. I guess
the exception would be people like Bob Brenner, who as an historian is
always focused on the empirical world and so didn't get lost in mainstream
social science. (Of course, I can't say I agree with everything he says).
>>
What about Erik Wright? David Schweickart? Or even me, in my own small,
narrowminded way? --jks
