I have followed this somewhat unfocussed debate on planning vs 
markets with some interest since I had the opportunity to co-write 
the EPE entry on Market Socialism and author two other related 
items in the encyclopaedia.  What I would suggest is that there 
needs to be some deeper investigation at what is entailed in the 
whole calculation debate and the evolution of thought on the 
interaction between market and plan. I would also suggest that we 
need look at the experience with market socialism -- i.e. the 
Yugoslav experience -- to see why, or indeed if, it went wrong.

However, if one is interested in the interaction of market and 
planning under socialism, I would suggest pen-l-ers would be 
advised to read (or reread) Branko Horva'ts 1982 book, _The 
Political Economy of Socialism_ (M.E. Sharpe) which I found to be 
an inspiring vision of what could be, without any detailed blueprint.  
Without being critical of David's work, I think Horvat's vision is 
somewhat broader than Schweikart's.

For a scholarly review of the calculation debate, and a strong 
defence of market socialism, see Bruno Jossa and Gaetano 
Cuomo, _The Economic Theory of Socialism and the Labour-
managed Firm_ which I reviewed in a recent issue of ROPE.  
Though their defence is highly theoretical (and neoclassical), they 
also emphasize a strong moral argument for worker self-
management (i.e. democractic, bottoms up) market socialism.  I 
should point out that none of these market socialist type 
approaches obviate the need for macro economic planning -- i.e. 
the level of overall investment, the provision of infrastructure, social 
programs, etc. where the market, necessarily, fails.

What dismays me a little in this debate is that most of the 
protagonists on all sides seem to have little knowledge of the 
literature, the proposals, the interpretations, the visions, of those 
on the left who propose democratic market socialism.  Without 
this, the list begins to resemble the tower of Babel -- with little or 
no communication.

Paul Phillips,
Economics,
University of Manitoba

Reply via email to