>Since I try as hard as I can to avoid > attributing motives and/or emotions to Justin, so I don't appreciate this > effort. Even if this remark is not aimed at me, I think that this mode of > argumentation violates the rules of "analytical philosophy" as I understand > them. Attacking someone's motives as a way of furthering an argument is a > basic logical fallacy. You must mean ulterior psycho-personal motives, since a basic premise of AM is that humans are rational beings capable of understanding their situation and making maximizing choices. They have always insisted on the neeed to understand rational motivations behind actions.
- Market socialism -- summing up? Michael Perelman
- Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Timework Web
- Re: Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Michael Perelman
- Re: Market socialism -- summing up? JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Jim Devine
- Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Ricardo Duchesne
- Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Market socialism -- summing up? JKSCHW
- Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Market socialism -- summing up? Jim Devine
- The Work Ethic Michael Perelman
- Re: The Work Ethic Ken Hanly
