>I'm amazed that the literary qualities of even chap. 1 of Capital >are being called into question. Section 4 is one of Marx's most >deservedly famous passages, the analysis of commodity fetishism, >which blends political economy, pyschology, philosophy, and cultural >analysis in dazzling ways. As much as I admire Keynes as a stylist, >nothing he wrote holds a candle to this. > >Doug The Yale Humanities Major speaks: §4 may be dazzling to you literati but 'tain't hardly accessible to the toiling masses... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Economics and Literature Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Peter Dorman
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Eric Nilsson
- Re: Economics and Literature Timework Web
- Re: Re: Economics and Literature Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Litera... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Economics and Literature Charles Brown
- Economics and Literature Charles Brown