agreed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael wrote, > > >Eric, isn't your critique true of a good deal of econometric work? > > Yes. But some econometric work is more flawed (in obvious ways) than others. > > The NC work on slavery is more obviously flawed than other econometric work. > > Eric -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chico, CA 95929 530-898-5321 fax 530-898-5901
- Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on sl... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Query on slavery enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery enilsson
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Query on slavery Forstater, Mathew
- Re: Query on slavery Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Query on slavery Michael Perelman
- Query on slavery Charles Brown