kelley said on 11/5/00 10:10 A > i honestly thought you were laboring under that impression since you >seemed to think that it would be so damaging to the GOP. disposing of the >abortion issue is no big deal. it is something that GOP would *like* to >get rid of. it isn't that much of a tool anymore. you're laboring under >the idea that it is, a rather ignorant assumption if you 1. know anything >about the right and the defection of some factions of the antiabortion >crowd and 2. understand anything about attitudes and opinions toward >abortion in the US I guess that I'll have to suffer in ignorance if the alternative is submitting to your guidance.
- RE: voting for Nader Austin, Andrew
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller
- Re: Re: voting for Nader kelley
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller
- Re: voting for Nader Tom Walker
- Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Justin Schwartz
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller
- Re: Re: voting for Nader kelley
- RE: Re: voting for Nader Austin, Andrew
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller
- RE: Re: voting for Nader Austin, Andrew
- Re: Re: voting for Nader J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: voting for Nader J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- social security query Jim Devine
- RE: social security query Max Sawicky
- Re: social security query Ellen Frank
- Re: social security query Brad DeLong
- RE: Re: Re: voting for Nader Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Re: voting for Nader J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
