The VP doesn't do that much, although people say that he was decisive
welfare reform.  Gore was a good campaigner when he could set the 
stage himself with no interaction, otherwise, he was terrible.

His strategy stunk.  Few anti-clinton people would have supported him
even if he had attacked Clinton.


On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:15:40PM -0500, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. wrote:
> MIchael,
>       Who serving as Clinton's VP could have done
> much better?  Bill Bradley?  Jesse Jackson?
> A lot of people are dumping on Gore, and he 
> certainly was stiff and made crucial misstatements
> at crucial times.  But, he was not as bad a campaigner
> as many think.  No VP was going to be given the 
> credit for the economy the way Clinton was, and how
> was one to escape the onus of Monica?
> Barkley Rosser

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to