I said:
(though David does not, you will be
>>happy
>>to hear, use any Marxist jargon).
>
Jim asks:
>Justin, what's wrong with Marxian jargon? should we reject all Marxian
>jargon and stick to the currently-dominant jargons ("entrepreneurial,"
>etc.)? should we also reject philosophical or legal jargon, or is your ire
>simply aimed at that of Marx?
>
No, I just thought that Norm in particular would prefer an explanation
unencumbered by jargon. I can sling the jargon myself as well as anyone,
better than some. I would prefer minimal jargon, philosophical, legal, or
Marxian in any event. If you can say what you mean in plain English prose,
why not do so?
--jks
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
