At 01:13 PM 11/30/00 -0500, you wrote: >Whose estimate should determine actions? A vote among everyone? A vote >among a random jury? Administrative agency experts? A panel of >distinguished academics? a vote among everyone seems needed to decide general principles. Experts and academics can advise the voters. Votes among those most affected seem appropriate for specific cases, under the rules set by general principles. A betting market encourages people to compete instead of working together on these issues, which is an error when external costs and benefits are so prevalent. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: Re: Progressive Information Ag... Peter Dorman
- Re: Progressive Information Aggreg... Robin Hanson
- Re: Progressive Information Aggreg... Robin Hanson
- Re: Progressive Information A... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Progressive Infor... Robin Hanson
- Re: Re: Progressive Informati... Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Re: Progressive I... Robin Hanson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Progressi... Peter Dorman
- Progressive Information A... Robin Hanson
- Re: Progressive Informati... Robin Hanson
- Re: Progressive Informati... Jim Devine
- Re: Progressive Informati... Robin Hanson
- Re: Re: Progressive Infor... Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Re: Progressive I... Robin Hanson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Progressi... Peter Dorman
- Re: Progressive Informati... Robin Hanson
- Crime and discrimination Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Progressive Infor... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Progressive Infor... Peter Dorman
- Re: Progressive Informati... Robin Hanson
- Re: Nader Paradox and the odds J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.