> First of all, this sort of smug communication has no place here.  Second, for
> those who are interested, I would suggest a look at Kulikoff, Allan. 2000. From
> British Peasants to Colonial American Farmers (Chapel Hill: University of North
> Carolina Press). 

Thanks for the source. That's a contribution. We just have a 
different sense of ethics. I call "smug" someone who is so 
complacent and self-satisfied about what they say that they don't 
think they even have to read about the subject matter, and yet 
believe we ALWAYS ought to hear their gassy views.   

Reply via email to