Justin: >>>JKS: philosophers cannot tell scientistr What Is Good Method. >> >>JD They can tell them, but only a small number will listen. > >I was unclear. I meant: We _should_ not tell them. We have no >special knowledge. No one appointed us the method police. I think you're right, but philosophers used to think that they had special insight into the nature of knowledge production. When do you think that philosophers decided that they really didn't? Moreover, if philosophy is not the master of all disciplines, telling us the truth of truths as it were, what is philosophy & what is the job of the philosopher? All is rhetoric, as Rorty says? Should Philosophy be subsumed under English & Comparative Literature, which in turn should be subsumed under History? Yoshie
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analytical philosophy Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analytical philosophy Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analytical philosophy Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analytical phil... J.A. Hernandez
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analytical phil... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analytical philo... Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: analyti... Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Ian intervenes Jim Devine
- Re: Re: analytical philosophy Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: analytical philosophy Ken Hanly
- RE: Re: Re: analytical philosophy Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: RE: Re: Re: analytical philosop... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: analytical philosophy Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: analytical philosophy Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: analytical philosophy ALI KADRI
- Re: analytical philosophy Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: analytical philosophy Justin Schwartz
- RE: Re: Re: Re: analytical philosophy Lisa & Ian Murray
- analytical philosophy Charles Brown