Doug wrote: >A recent NBER working paper <http://papers.nber.org/papers/W8058> finds >very little effect of trade on national wage structures; what really >matters are domestic wage-setting insitutions. Those are being ripped to >shreds in lots of places. Doug, isn't commonplace for us lefties to say that "globalization is more than trade," i.e., that issues of capital (both financial and real, portfolio and direct) and labor-power mobility play a big role? Further, what is it that is "ripping" the domestic wage-setting institution to shreds? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- 'Anti-globalization activists have their facts wrong... Robert MacDiarmid
- RE: 'Anti-globalization activists have their fa... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: 'Anti-globalization activists have their fa... Michael Perelman
- Re: 'Anti-globalization activists have their fa... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-globalization activists h... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-globalization activis... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-globalization... Anthony D'Costa
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-glob... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'A... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: 'Anti-globali... Paul Phillips
- Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-glo... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Anti... Paul Phillips
- Re: 'Anti-globalizatio... Peter Dorman
