Jim Devine wrote:
>capital mobility, not trade, helps explain the "race to the bottom,"
>as different countries compete to cut labor costs to attract capital.
Could you offer some empirical evidence for this? Of the first world
countries, the U.S. was the only one to see a sustained decline in
real wages, a trend that reversed after 1995, though "globalization"
hasn't been reversed, nor has capital become any less mobile. In
Africa and Latin America, which have had a largely dismal time of it
over the last 20 years, the major culprit has been structural
adjustment programs - imposed politically, though the IMF ("a toy of
the United States to pursue its economic policy offshore," as Rudi
Dornbusch helpfully put it). Africa is largely outside the circuit of
mobile capital.
Doug
- 'Anti-globalization activists have their facts wrong... Robert MacDiarmid
- RE: 'Anti-globalization activists have their fa... Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: 'Anti-globalization activists have their fa... Michael Perelman
- Re: 'Anti-globalization activists have their fa... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: 'Anti-globalization activists have ... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-globalization activis... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-globalization... Anthony D'Costa
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-glob... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'A... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: 'Anti-globali... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: 'Anti-globali... Paul Phillips
- Re: Re: Re: 'Anti-glo... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Anti... Paul Phillips
- Re: 'Anti-globalizatio... Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: 'Anti-globaliz... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Doug Henwood
- "globalization&qu... Jim Devine
- Re: "globalizatio... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: "globaliz... Jim Devine
