At 03:20 PM 3/27/01 -0800, you wrote: >Why a gold standard? Why not, say, an oil standard? Or some other commodity >that's valued by "late" capital? Wasn't gold made the standard as a holdover >from some ancient metaphysics/superstition--it looks nice and has great >electrical properties but what's so great about it? I guess any commodity will do, but I would guess that most of the world would go back to tradition -- i.e., gold -- if "things fall apart." (With oil, there might also be objections if Saudi Arabia became the world's banker, while usually money is useless _per se_.) Maybe we should have an experiment and see what happens... Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Interesting new book? Keaney Michael
- Re: Interesting new book? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Interesting new book? Louis Proyect
- The Con Flag Jim Devine
- Re: The Con Flag J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Interesting new book? Timework Web
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? Chris Burford
- Re: Re: Re: Interesting new book? Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Interesting new book? Ian Murray
- dollar and universal money Jim Devine
- dollar and universal money Chris Burford
- Re: dollar and universal money Jim Devine
- Re: Re: dollar and universal ... Chris Burford
- RE: Re: Interesting new book? michael pugliese
- Interesting new book? Keaney Michael
- RE: Re: Re: Interesting new book? michael pugliese
