I have been trying to avoid debates about the World Trade Center here.  Since
Steve posted the article about Churchill, several points are in order.

1. Churchill is a Native American, who has written extensively about the
Holocaust of Native Americans.  His thesis has not been warmly received.  So I
can understand why he may express some insensitivity about the slaughter of
Americans -- even if some of the "Americans" were not really Americans are
all.

2. Churchill's strong language makes for easy criticism, but once Churchill is
picked off, then the pressure put on people like my colleague, George Wright,
for making a couple statements that were taken out of context, becomes
acceptable.  The attack on freedom of speech always begins at the margin.


--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901

Reply via email to