----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >The empirical equivalence thesis is part of Q-D, no? Wasn't meaning >to suggest it was the whole shebang. I don't think so. It's verificationist. Q-D is not. jks =============== And Q-D incorporates the EET precisely to show it's limitations lead to the UTE, no? Time for some Web of Belief tweaking eh? Ian
