no i meant you weren' t the only one w/claims to pre-K vision. mbs
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Devine, James > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:44 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [PEN-L:23086] RE: RE: Krugman Komes Around > > > Max, I don't understand your point. It sounds like PK is leaning > in the EPI > direction on this one. > > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Max Sawicky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:32 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [PEN-L:23076] RE: Krugman Komes Around > > > > > > Not so fast Sparky. > > > > http://www.epinet.org/Issuebriefs/ib175.html > > > > http://www.epinet.org/webfeatures/econindicators/jobspict.html > > > > http://www.epinet.org/briefingpapers/bp121.html > > > > > > mbs > > > > > [Maybe I should sue because of violation of my intellectual > > > property rights > > > (see > > http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/faculty/jdevine/talks/ESTalk020502.htm) ;-) > > > ... still, this is a pretty good article.] > > > > > The W Scenario > > > By PAUL KRUGMAN > > > First comes the victory parade. Later we'll find out if we won. > > >
