But this loyal strategic ally has no oil and is opposed by US Arab allies who do have the oil. By its intransigence in refusing to withdraw from Palestinian authority areas and by its oppression of Palestinians Israel complicates rather than helps the US control oil producing states in the region. It also threatens the stability of states such as Saudi Arabia whose population is increasingly anti-US precisely because of the US support for Sharon and silence about Israeli atrocities. Certainly one could expect support for Israel as a strategic ally but how is Israel loyal when it deliberately ignores US presidential demands to withdraw. Israeli actions make a planned attack on Iraq much more difficult--by alienating all of Iraq's neighbours and also threatens stability in places such as Bahrain which are militarily important for the US. Israel is not loyal to the US. Quite the opposite. Israel is willing to stand up to the US if it feels it is in its interest to do so. It can do this because of the political power of the Israel lobby and fellow Christian right travellers etc. and because Bush is just unwilling to risk the political flack of standing up to Sharon. Powell now has gone even further and is suggesting that Arafat need not be part of a peace conference suggested by Israel. The bowing and scraping before Sharon is amazing. I will have to admit though that it was kind of Sharon to allow Powell to see Arafat in the first place--of course after Arafat had explicitly and in Arabic as demanded condemned Palestinian as well as Israeli terrorism. This was no doubt a reward to the US for being so one-sided and also silent about Israeli atrocities while vocal about Palestinian suicide bombers. The European Union officials couldn't get a pass to go in and visit from Sharon. They havent been nice enough. No doubt the Israel lobby is also aided by the weapons producers lobby since Israel is an important customer.
Cheers, Ken Hanly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:32 PM Subject: [PEN-L:24958] RE: Fw: Margolis on the tail wagging the dog > I think it's a mistake to put so much emphasis on the Israeli lobby's > impact. As Seumas Milne argued in the GUARDIAN awhile back, the reason why > the U.S. elite favors Isreal is because the latter is the most loyal > strategic ally that the U.S. has in a very strategic (read: oil) area. The > Israeli lobby exploits that. > > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ken Hanly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: pen-l > > Cc: Cy Gonick; Sid Shniad > > Subject: [PEN-L:24957] Fw: Margolis on the tail wagging the dog > > > > > > > > Sorry about the blank message! Cheers, Ken Hanly > > > > Why Bush dances to Sharon's tune > > Israel's right-wing Likud party dominates U.S. Mideast policy > > through a > > powerful lobby in the American Congress > > By ERIC MARGOLIS -- Contributing Foreign Editor > > Who really is running America's Mideast policy? Last week, > > the astounded > > world saw the grotesque spectacle of President George W. Bush > > pleading in > > vain with Ariel Sharon, leader of a nation of only 6.3 > > million people which > > receives almost $5 billion in annual U.S. aid, to cease > > laying waste the > > Occupied West Bank. > > > > Ignoring worldwide condemnation and demands from the UN > > Security Council, > > Sharon ordered his armour, much of it American-supplied, to accelerate > > shooting up and bulldozing Palestinian towns, refugee camps > > and all symbols > > of Palestinian identity or statehood. Twenty years ago, Sharon invaded > > Lebanon, "to crush Palestinian terrorism." His big guns and warplanes > > blasted Beirut for three weeks, killing 17,000 civilians. > > Today, he remains > > determined to hold Arab lands Israel conquered in 1967 and to > > destroy any > > hopes or vestiges of a viable Palestinian state. > > > > President Bush and senior aides Condoleezza Rice and Colin > > Powell were left > > looking weak, indecisive, and inept. Bush clearly is a > > political soulmate of > > ultra-hawk Sharon; they share a mutual detestation for Yasser > > Arafat and, it > > would seem, for Arabs in general. > > > > Bush has been encouraging Sharon's attacks on Palestine for > > months. But > > Israel's invasion of the West Bank - reminiscent of Soviet > > tanks crushing > > Hungary in 1956 - gravely threatened America's Mideast client > > regimes, so > > Bush had to demand Sharon relent. > > > > SHEER FARCE > > > > In an act of sheer farce, Powell was sent on a slow boat to > > Israel, via > > Madrid and Morocco. Before Powell even arrived, former > > Israeli PM Benjamin > > Netanyahu summoned fawning U.S. senators and arrogantly informed them > > Powell's mission would fail. > > > > While the rest of the world condemned Israel's invasion and > > destruction of > > the Palestinian ghettos, not a peep was heard from the White > > House, Congress > > or America's media about Israel's violation of U.S. law in using > > U.S.-supplied armour and warplanes against civilians. Nor > > about Israel's > > violation of the Geneva Conventions and other international > > laws. There were > > no protests when Israel's Shimon Peres described massacres of > > Palestinian > > civilians by Israeli soldiers. > > > > Nor even a tut-tut when Sharon named to his cabinet a > > fanatical right-wing > > general who advocates ethnic cleansing of Palestinians - the > > same crime for > > which the U.S. pursued Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic. > > > > To be sure, there is deep and justified sympathy in the U.S. for the > > frightful suffering Israel has endured at the hands of > > suicide bombers, and > > its need for self-defence. > > > > Still, why was America alone in defending Israel's ruthless > > punishment of > > the Palestinians? > > > > How could Bush, only a few weeks ago, still bathing in the > > bogus glory of a > > military "triumph" against a few thousand medieval tribesman > > in Afghanistan, > > be so suddenly made to look foolish and impotent by events in > > the Mideast? > > > > Simply put, Sharon's right-wing Likud party has come to dominate U.S. > > Mideast policy through its powerful American lobby, which > > "guides" Congress. > > > > Under pressure from the Israel lobby, 89 out of 100 senators > > and at least > > 280 congressmen recently demanded Bush give Sharon carte > > blanche to crush > > Palestine. As the Israeli writer Uri Avnery wryly noted, if > > the Israel lobby > > gave orders to repeal the Ten Commandments, Congress would > > vote in favour. > > > > America's media is strongly pro-Israel and averse to > > dissenting views. A > > coterie of hawkish, Israel-first neo-conservatives dominates media > > opinion-making and the Pentagon, leading the charge for a war > > against Iraq, > > Iran, and Syria. One even helped to write Bush's foolish > > "axis of evil" > > speech. > > > > Tight U.S. mid-term elections are approaching. > > > > Bush does not want to anger American Jewish voters who > > believe Israel is in > > mortal danger. > > > > GEORGE SR. ROASTED > > > > Bush obviously recalls that when his father sought to > > pressure Israel to > > halt building illegal settlements, Bush Sr. was unfairly > > roasted by the > > media as an anti-Semite and forced to back down. No wonder > > Sharon can thumb > > his nose at the White House. > > > > Bush likes to talk tough, but this crisis has shown him to be > > the exact > > opposite. In Texas, they'd say, "big hat, no land." Bush has > > so far failed > > to take any real action to halt America's Mideast interests > > being undermined > > by the bloodbath in Palestine and Israel. > > > > The best way to protect Israelis from terror attacks is to > > withdraw their > > 200,000 illegal settlers and end their colonial rule over the > > West Bank, > > Gaza and Golan; divide East Jerusalem into Jewish, Muslim, > > and Christian > > sectors, have NATO troops police peace accords and either normalize > > relations with the Arabs, as the Saudis propose, or build a > > wall to isolate > > Israel from its neighbours. This cannot be done so long as settlements > > remain. > > > > Sharon is dead set against this sensible idea. He needs to be > > pushed the way > > Dwight Eisenhower ordered Israel, in 1956, to get out of the > > Sinai, which it > > had invaded and occupied - or else. Had Bush Eisenhower's integrity or > > genuine patriotism, he would compel Sharon to accept the wise > > Saudi peace > > plan and forget dreams of recreating biblical Greater Israel. > > This would be > > a boon to Jews and Arabs alike. > > > > But Bush junior is no Eisenhower. His dithering over the > > Mideast has made > > the United States appear both helpless and a tacit supporter > > of Israel's > > West Bank repression - and made America the potential target of more > > terrorist attacks from the enraged Arab world. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------- > > ---- > > Eric can be reached by e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Letters to the editor should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > > visit his home > > page. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
