Chris wrote: > about Hardt or Negri, if they had never existed, > a marxist approach would still predict that the > possibility of imperialism turning into ultra-imperialism > could be of enormous strategic significance.
Although I don't understand what exactly is meant above, I believe it would have been more meaningful if you used the word "identify" instead of the word "predict". That imperialism may turn into ultra-imperialism is of course a possibility. But identifying it as a possibility has nothing to do with predicting anything. Just a minor point, or a "tangential" point, as you might have liked to call it. Sabri, who is still working till the morning in these days.
