yeah, but all those economists became interesting by doing more than mere economics.
(Of course, economics is interesting to economists. But since accounting is interesting to accountants, that hardly proves anything.) ------------------------ Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Back to slavery > > > Jim, you might be wrong. We have a Nobelist in the dock > right now? What > about the Harvard-Russian scandal? One of our Chico > students, Khoshigian > (sp?) has been at the center of international intrigue. Ken Lay, for > God's sake. I think that we need a cable channel for economics. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Devine, James wrote: > > > > I'm going to have nightmares about a TV show "John Pareto, > Economist." Of course, people would start complaining that > there aren't enough ads to break up the tedium... > > > > ------------------------ > > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine > > -- > Michael Perelman > Economics Department > California State University > Chico, CA 95929 > > Tel. 530-898-5321 > E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
