Okay, so Krugman explains where the spectacular GDP growth mainly came from:

-  final demand excluding the increase in stocks actually grew faster than
GDP.
-  housing grew at a 20 percent rate
-  spending on consumer durables rose at a 27 percent rate last quarter.
-  consumers take advantage of low-interest financing, cash from home
refinancing and tax rebate checks

This is very a similar story to New Zealand and many other developed
capitalist countries. No wonder that we are dealing with jobless growth !!
But a socialist would need to ask: who is actually doing the spending ?
Which social classes are buying houses and durables ? How can you say that
"tax breaks" accounted for growth, when we are talking about a consumer boom
mainly fueled by loaned money and refinancing ? I haven't done a
disaggregate analysis of the US GDP data, and anyway the quarterly figures
usually don't provide that anyway. But even without seeing the data, clearly
you cannot "borrow or refinance" without having some kind of collateral or
asset already, and therefore the people spending must be in a position to
spend, i.e. they must have property already, i.e. it must be a propertied
class who is doing the spending.

The effect of Bush's Keynesian pump priming via tax breaks is thus prima
facie not genuine industry growth as shown by a significant expansion of the
capital goods sector (Department 1) but rather personal consumer spending by
people who have assets already. It looks more like a Kaleckian "electoral
business cycle" strategem.

In previous mails, I noted two important insights by Karl Marx:

(1) GDP should never be confused with the total national income or the total
income distribution, since it refers only to net new income generated by
"production" (which excludes a portion of net interest receipts by financial
institutions, and includes the rental value of owner occupied housing).

(2) Net output growth should not be confused with private capital
accumulation, since, with the aid of a sophisticated credit system, high
physical output per worker in material production, and monetary
manipulations, capital accumulation can become semi-autonomous from net
output growth.

I am not a professional economist, but even just applying these two simple
insights, I could elaborate a whopping socialist critique of Government
economic policy and suggest basic alternatives which benefit ordinary
working folks.

J.

Reply via email to