Right you are, James. The freedom of Bush and the bourgeoisie is for me and my class, un-freedom--continued wage-slavery. On the other hand, freedom for me and my class from wage-slavery should translate into a generalized freedom for all.
Progressively yours, Mike B) P.S. Jurrien, thanks for that excellent explanation of how Marx fits into the Green question. On the question of the reality of the, > if enough cold, fresh water coming >> from the melting polar ice caps and the melting >> glaciers of Greenland flows into the northern >> Atlantic, it will shut down the Gulf Stream, which >> keeps Europe and northeastern North America warm. see: http://news.independent.co.uk/low_res/story.jsp?story=484490&host=3&dir=58 Geoffrey Lean, Global Warming Will Plunge Britain into New Ice Age 'Within Decades' --- "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but what is "freedom"? to Dubya, it's greater > freedom for capital, especially for his cronies. > > ------------------------ > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & > http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine > > > > the word "progressive" is profoundly ambiguous. > is > > > it Bull Moose and Teddy Roosevelt? or > Lafollette? or > > > Henry Wallace? > > > > ************* > > > > To me progress is a directional verb with the > > direction being towards greater freedom. If the > > movement leads elsewhere, it is not progressive. > > > > Regards, > > Mike B) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
