I wonder if Paul Krugman is embarrassed to appear on the same op-ed page as this fellow:
He should... the same way we all should feel embarrassed for sharing the same federal administration with David Brooks. It may be as hard for us to alter the White House's policies as for Krugman to alter the New York Times' editorial policy, which seems to me like a very tight (and uptight) family-controlled "public" company.
Mostly, I'd think that David Brooks should be held personally responsible for the crap he writes. To defend Bush, Brooks twists his sentences and arguments like Moebius strips of the kind Escher would have drawn when drunk. Instead of linking Brooks to Krugman, I would associate his garbage with those articles by Tom Friedman defending the invasion of Iraq.
Recently, in the same op-ed pages where Will Safire and Tom Friedman justify it, Noam Chomsky blasted Ariel Sharon's Wall. Good for Noam!
Julio
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latino.msn.com/autos/
