Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
Why can't we say that Eisner is a capitalist, whether or not he works?
We can, and I would (and do). Why do you think otherwise?
Doug
I asked because you said, by way of example, "Even Michael Eisner is a worker, at least for a little while longer." A good number of Americans may be confused about class, but I doubt too many of them are so confused as to think that Eisner is just a worker like most of them.
Americans who are confused about class probably wish to believe that college education, white-collar work, and/or supervisory responsibilities put them out of the working class and into the "middle class," rather than believe that Eisner is a worker and not a capitalist because he works. -- Yoshie
* Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>
