On Thursday, May 13, 2004 at 14:41:13 (-0400) Doug Henwood writes:
>                                           ... the argument you
>sometimes see that Bush is actually a lesser evil than Kerry. (See,
>for example, Gabriel Kolko's piece in Counterpunch.) ...

Actually, his argument was a bit different, in fact the opposite,
wasn't it?  Kolko said something like Bush is so much greater an evil
that he could ultimately destroy US hegemony.  Kerry, being less
blatantly aggressive and deluded, would likely repair the damage and
keep the thing going longer.


Bill

Reply via email to