joanna bujes wrote: > > Possibly (and very funny), but the thing is, the profits still go to the US. >
This is a common shorthand, but it is probably best to avoid it. The "US" is not a profit center, and hence no profits go to "the US" as such, any more than the riches of India went to "England" as such. If "England" included those men, women, & children whose lives are summarized in the chapter on the working day in _Capital_, then there is a certain indifference to human suffering in referring to the profit "England" gained from the Indian empire. The same applies to "the US" today. I believe that it is worth some clumsiness of language or added verbosity to avoid bunching Walmart employees, the mentally ill living on on disability, and the actual recipients of those "profits" all under the same label, "The US." Carrol
