Smith (III.v,12, 362) even lumped together "labouring cattle" and "productive labourers" in his description of a world dominated by stock.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:59:41PM -0700, Devine, James wrote: > you don't understand Locke. He didn't think of his servant as a human being, so that > the servant's labor didn't produce property for her (according to Locke's labor > theory of property). Instead, she was like Locke's horse. > > ------------------------ > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine > > -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
