In a message dated 8/2/2004 10:28:39 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Russians lived more poorly than people in any other of the
republics or in the Eastern Bloc (except maybe Albania?). Moscow may have been a
possible exception. It's one of the reasons why Russia junked them. Ironically,
those losses of subsidies have resulted in the wealthiest of the republics --
like Georgia and Moldova -- into the poorest. Russians now live better than
people anywhere else in the fSU, except maybe the Baltics, which is why you have
so much illegal immigration from them into Russia.<
There are lots of Soviet jokes depicting Castro as sucking at
Brezhnev's teat.
Comment This Great Russian Bully . . . seeking the restoration of an
historially evolved privledge . . . was unshackled as the results of the era of
Nitkia Khrushchev . . . although many may had thought they met the "bully boy."
Being forced to try and recover what you had is a harsh
school.
Striving to receive what you think you have coming is the
school of chauvinism. This Great Russian Bully . . . who was handcuffed and
forced to serve the dictatorship of the proletariat is going to teach some harsh
lessons. Lessons an enormous section of our proletariat learnt in a pervious era
and during several junctures in the development of our industrial system.
Wealth is measured against master's house and not your
neighbors shack.
Khruschev's betrayal of Lumumba and the Congo set the basis
for the evolution of Soviet policy up to the collapse of Soviet Power and the
overthrow of its property relations in the industrial infrastructure.
The vassal states of the Soviet Union were not colonies or the
meaning of colonies in the sense of bourgeois imperialism. The Soviet Union was
an imperial power and its responsibility was to uplift the petty bourgeois
countries and aid the world proletariat to the best of its ability.
Any modern economy operating on the basis of the exchange of
labor is going to manifest economic inequality. What Russia junked was
socialism. The people of the Soviet Union understood that Brezhnev was not a
Red. I remember their jokes from this period . . . concerning Brezhnev trying to
impress his mother with his power and wealth and privileges.
At the end of the story . . . Brezhnev's mother looks at him
and says . . . "you have done well son . . . but what you gonna do when the Reds
come back?"
The real ideological basis of support of the counter
revolution . . . outside the apparatus that intermingles with international
capital and the characters able to exact tribute from Ivan Average on the basis
of their station in the bureaucratic apparatus (something understood by every
industrial worker having labored in a large factor or tenured Professor
languishing under the heavy hand of the machine) . . . is the petty bourgeois
intellectual that alter the ideological sphere on behalf of its prejudices.
What wrecked the Soviet Union was democracy and I do not mean
incarceration or the lack or social engineering . . . but the petty bourgeois
concept of workers democracy and political rights.
If you are fighting on an economic terrain that is hostile to
you all you have is ideology as the social glue. Under the Stalin regime there
could be no talk of the ANC being niggers at the trough of the Soviet Economy or
Castro sucking a breast.
None of us get a world like we envision it and workers in
America are in the process of showing the world their conception of democracy.
It is not going to be pretty and our greatest failing is the inability to
understand how people actually think things out.
It means we cannot reach our workers because subjective
conception of democracy create the unbridgeable class barrier.
Poland gets what it deserves. Those within the former Soviet
Union are going to get what they deserve and they are going to pay more than
under Sovietism. The world workers are going to get what they deserve and are
paying more than under Sovietism.
Then again . . . the damn bureaucracy flips . . . man. And the
bureaucracy is not a class. In the Soviet Union the bureaucracy was an excretion
of the state in practical terms due to its peculiar curve of development. In the
historical sense it was part of the line of industrial development.
Where in history has any society every overthrown the machine
before its economic basis was eroded?
The Bully Boy is back . . . the real bully boy and not that
guy you freaking thought was a bully. A democratic slave master is still a slave
master however . . . and there were some decent slave masters . . . according to
some who never escaped the mental chains of slavery . . . or rather bourgeois
democracy.
Melvin P.
|
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on M... Louis Proyect
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Michael Hoover
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Devine, James
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Mosco... Louis Proyect
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Devine, James
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Mosco... Louis Proyect
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Devine, James
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Devine, James
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Devine, James
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Mosco... Louis Proyect
- Re: The Soviet "empire" was a drain on Moscow Waistline2