by David B. Shemano

Why is your personal opinion relevant?  I mean, I am sure I can find
somebody
(Melvin P.?) who apparently highly values going 100.  Therefore, your
opinion
is cancelled out.  Now what do we do?

^^^^^

CB: Well, it's like why vote ? Your vote is only one in millions. How can it
be relevant ? David Shemano's vote is going to cancel yours , so why vote ?

In general, all we have here on email is opinions ,no ? For example, you
recognized that opinions are readily expressed in this mediuam when you said
to Michael Perelman:

"I don't have a strong opinion on whether regulation should be done by
legislation or litigation -- it seems like a peripheral issue."


Would your opinion have been relevant if you had one ?

^^^^^^^^^



Why do you assume such facts for a socialist society?  We have 75 years of
experience with socialist inspired economies.  Did they place a higher value
on
safety compared to comparable capitalist societies?

^^^^^
CB: Well, yea for automobile safety. The Soviet cars were like tanks, which
, Justin mentioned, would be the direction that you would go to have safer
cars. They had more mass transportation in the form of omnibuses, trains,
trolleys than individualized units, as Melvin alluded to as a safer form,
generally.
Obviously, there can be train accidents too.

We have too much capitalism in the world to get a full socialist test of
more safety in general. Lets get rid of capitalism and find out what we can
really do as humans.

^^^^^^^

Were they able to
implement safety concerns more economically than comparable capitalist
societies?

^^^^^
CB: Good question. I'm not sure how you would get a comparable capitalist
society , but if you think my opinion on it is relevant, I'd say a
comparable capitalist economy for the SU would be someplace like Brazil in
some senses at some periods.

It's hard because the Soviet Union (and all socialist inspired economies)
had to put so much economic emphasis on military defense because capitalism
was constantly invading them or threatening to nuke
'em. This throws off all ability to measure from Soviet and socialist
inspired history what might be the benefits of a peaceful socialist
development  of a regime of safety from our own machines.

^^^


It seems to me that safety increases in value as a society becomes
wealthier, and the value is not correlated to the economic system itself.

^^^^^
CB What do you mean by "safety increases in value" ? I'm not sure human life
is valued more highly as society gets wealthier.


 Death and injury by automobile accidents is the main cause of premature
death in the U.S., isn't it ?







Reply via email to