I'd go with what Sean says here. It all depends on the level of
popular support that can be mobilized for it.


On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Sean Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming you think this is not a trivial piece of legislation, where do
>>> all you hot lefts stand
>>> on the prospects for the bill?  Are you prepared to be
>>> embarrassed/pleasantly surprised?
>>
>> He'll make a symbolic stand, and then surrender as the Reps filibuster it.
>>
>> Doug
>
> Doesn't it really depend on whether this is seen as a widespread issue
> or not? If there is a lot of support for it--you know, more than most
> Union legislation in the country--then it might create some more
> political counter-pressure.  I think that is more unlikely than the
> possibility that he would veto it or back down if there was a fight
> over it.
>
> In other words, I think the bet should be over whether enough people
> will give a shit about it to raise enough of a stink to counter the
> corporate, libertarian bullshit that's already fuming over it.  EFCA
> is one of those things that I've seen nothing about in
> quasi-liberal/left publications and websites but find people like
> George Will already laying the groundwork for an Orwellian counter
> push about being the real force protecting employee's freedom--from
> unions.  In that environment, there would be no political gain for him
> to help pass it, even if he believed in the principles behind it
> (which, IIRC, he has said he does at some point.)  This, indeed, would
> be a test case, but not in terms of whether "The One" will do what's
> right.  Instead, it will be whether the movement that elected him has
> any sense of what needs to be changed.  On that, I'd say Jim (and I
> guess Doug, though no $$ amount there) has the smart money at the
> moment.
>
> s
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Sandwichman
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to