Maybe I just don't understand Ann's concern. To me, sunk costs are irrelevant because value -- and, therefore, money, capital, and financial wealth in general -- is an expectation. And I don't understand what Michael Perelman says: Is the notion of irrelevant sunk costs wrongheaded because economists confuse stocks with flows or vice versa? I don't think so.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
