The New York Times / January 20, 2010

Letter from China
China Could Learn From Henry Ford
By MICHAEL FORSYTHE

BEIJING — “Little” Xie says he wants to own one of the vehicles he
helps build at the Ford assembly plant in the Yangtze River city of
Chongqing. With his mortgage payment taking about 60 percent of his
2,000 renminbi monthly pay, that won’t happen soon.

“It isn’t even worth talking about company incentives to help buy a
car, since I can’t afford one in the first place,” said Xie, 28, a
six-year Ford employee, as he approached the factory gates for his
night shift. Xie, whose nickname comes from his youthful age, asked
that his full name not be used.

Higher wages for people like Xie would help resolve China’s biggest
economic challenge: shifting away from growth fueled by exports and
investment and moving toward an economy driven more by domestic
consumers. China’s Communist leaders might learn a lesson about how to
create a more prosperous working class from the American industrialist
Henry Ford.

The founder of the auto manufacturer that bears his name generated
headlines around the world in January 1914 by doubling the average
autoworker’s pay to $5 a day. The move made Ford’s Model T more
affordable, created a more stable work force and helped stoke the
growth of the U.S. middle class, according to Bob Kreipke, the
historian for the company, based in Dearborn, Michigan.

“This allowed people to increase their buying power and, at the same
time, they produced a better product,” Mr. Kreipke said.

[but that was not Ford's purpose. Rather, he wanted to reduce
turnover. If his goal had been to raise workers' purchasing power, he
would have supported unionization.]

Low wages in the world’s third-largest economy are slowing the rise of
a consumer culture that Premier Wen Jiabao and President Hu Jintao
have said China needs to maintain expansion at the 8 percent a year
that will generate jobs for its 1.3 billion people. The current growth
pattern is “unsustainable,” Mr. Wen said Dec. 27.

That hasn’t stopped China’s auto industry from booming, with sales
last year of 13.6 million vehicles, eclipsing the United States as the
world’s top market for the first time, according to figures from the
China Association of Automobile Manufacturers in Beijing. The surge in
purchases was driven partly by government subsidies to help farmers
buy vehicles.

Encouraging higher pay might help sustain the boom and bolster
consumption, which currently accounts for about 35 percent of China’s
gross domestic product, compared with 70 percent in the United States.
It would also help ease income gaps between the rich and poor, which
are greater than those in South Korea and Taiwan at similar stages of
development and have led to riots and other labor unrest.

Ford’s $5 daily pay allowed an employee to buy a Model T that cost
$440 with the equivalent of about four months of wages. [of course,
they could have bought other things instead, which is why Ford wasn't
raising wages to sell cars.] Chinese factory workers averaged 24,192
renminbi, or $3,544, a year in 2008, according to figures from the
National Bureau of Statistics in Beijing, so it would take more than
three years of wages for them to afford the cheapest car advertised on
the company’s Chinese-language Web site: a four-door hatchback with a
1.3 liter engine listed for 78,900 renminbi.

[do we really want China to engage in "automobilization," with all of
the negative effects on the environment?]

While the auto company declined to comment on worker pay, Ellen
Hughes-Cromwick, Ford’s chief economist, said Ford was projecting
growth 10 years into the future for the countries where it operates,
and it saw China’s economy in a period of expansion characterized by
rapid rises in employee compensation similar to South Korea’s economy
starting in the 1960s.

“We are at a situation where wages are moving up and doubling in a
very short period of time,” Ms. Hughes-Cromwick said in a telephone
interview from Dearborn. “We do expect takeoff to generate pretty
substantial wage gains.”

One way the Chinese government might help raise pay would be to
increase the value of the renminbi, said Nicholas Lardy, who studies
the Chinese economy as a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for
International Economics in Washington.

[it's interesting how this article's prescription fits so well with
the US policy elite's goals of raising the renminbi.]

U.S. and European officials have said that China keeps the renminbi
artificially low to improve sales in foreign markets. An undervalued
currency encourages manufactured exports at the expense of developing
the more labor-intensive service sector, depressing job growth and
keeping wages low, Mr. Lardy said.

“Appreciation would lead to more rapid growth in the demand for labor
and thus to more employment growth and more wage growth,” he said.

China should also spend more on education for peasants and migrants to
raise their skill levels and employment prospects, said Xiao Geng,
director of the Brookings-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy in
Beijing.

Henry Ford employed some of the millions of East European immigrants
who poured into the United States a century ago, as well as migrants
from the South and Midwest lured by high wages. China’s leaders must
deal with hundreds of millions of rural laborers coming to cities, who
put downward pressure on salaries.

“Unskilled workers are condemned for generations to low wages,” Mr. Xiao said.

Even a skilled worker like Gong — who also asked that his full name
not be used — said he makes only 6 renminbi an hour as a welder at
Ford’s Chongqing plant, 9 renminbi an hour for overtime. “I have a
dream of someday buying a car,” said Gong, 29, as he walked home in
the rain after a 10-hour shift. “I guess it will take six years of
saving.”

Bloomberg News

Copyright 2010
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to