Good times are comin'/I hear it everywhere I go
Good times are comin'/But they're sure comin' slow
- Neil Young, "Vampire Blues"

Jack Lessen berry: State Rep. Dave Agema is a narrow, far right-wing 
Republican, a former airline pilot from Grand Rapids. Until last week, his 
major claim to political fame was this: Back during the battle to balance the 
budget in 2007, the year there was a brief government shutdown, he was the only 
member of the Michigan Legislature not to show up. 


Why? Well, he was off hunting sheep in Siberia, which he deemed more important. 
Two years later, an EPIC-MRA survey of political insiders found he was the 
least effective legislator.


Unfortunately, he has power now; he chairs a subcommittee overseeing the 
Department of Human Services budget. Agema defended cutting $9.9 million from 
the clothing allowance for orphans, saying he thought the money often was used 
for other things. Perhaps he worried they used it for contraband, like food.


The Michigan Catholic Conference was aghast, saying this "would only create 
greater hardships for the poor and disadvantaged children and disabled persons 
across the state."


Disabled? By the way, Captain Crunch also cast the deciding vote cutting State 
Disability Assistance for people who have gallantly struggled to live 
independently. They had been getting $269 a month. That's being slashed to $175.


That one, by the way, was Gov. Rick Snyder's idea. Agema, who cast the deciding 
vote to kick the disabled, gallantly defended it, however, with the most 
powerful intellectual argument his airline pilot brain could make: They don't 
give them any money in Indiana.


Agema is a special case of callousness, but not that special. Throughout the 
capitol, committees and subcommittees are weakening the things that make 
civilization possible. Slashing education, endangering children and the poor, 
toppling the former middle class into poverty.


Some of this is being done because post-automotive Michigan has little money, 
and we've been covering up deficits and running on fumes. But mostly, what they 
are doing is designed to give huge tax breaks to business.


The theory has become an article of mindless right-wing faith. Slash taxes; 
businesses pour in and create vast amount of new jobs.
Even at a lower rate of taxes, money comes pouring in to state coffers, and 
Lansing can fund education again. Maybe even buy a pony. Only trouble is that 
it doesn't really work very well, if at all.

Kyle Melinn, editor of the respected MIRS newsletter, which covers Lansing, 
wrote an interesting piece last week revealing that nobody has any idea whether 
slashing taxes Snyder-style would create any jobs at all. He noted that Snyder 
and Lieutenant Gov. Brian Calley have been pulling back from their earlier 
confident pie-in-the-sky predictions of jobs galore. 


Last week, after touting his plan, the governor added, "I can't guarantee 
results." His deputy echoed that, saying, "What we do believe is that our plan 
will create an environment that is likely to encourage job growth."


Studies show modern businesses care more about quality of life than taxes. 
Melinn posed the key question our lawmakers are failing to ask: "Is this 
'economic gardening' going to coax business leaders into our state — or will 
the business community's argument about needing a tiny tax rate be exposed as 
humbug when private-sector decision-makers recoil at our crummy roads, 
disinvested schools, depleted police forces and sky-high university tuition 
rates?"


The governor is betting everything on this one tremendous gamble. Those who 
don't like it have little choice.


The Democrats haven't even offered any alternative plan. That's because they 
are afraid to say what they need to say, which is that it is time for the rich 
to pay their fair share.


That's right. For the last 30 years, we've been engaged in a giant transfer of 
wealth in this country from the poor and the middle class to the wealthiest 1 
percent of Americans.


That, more than anything else, is destroying this country, aided by the 
nastiness and anger and silly ideological polarization.


Charley Ballard, a Michigan State professor who knows more about this state's 
economy than anyone, tells me we could increase our income tax rate from 4.35 
percent to 5.5 percent with virtually no negative effects — and vast positive 
ones.


We could use that money to repair some of our crumbling infrastructure and 
invest in early childhood development, things business should want, Ballard 
told me.


Tragically, you don't hear Democrats talking about this, because they have no 
guts. The best, as Billy Butler Yeats used to say, lack all conviction. The 
worst are filled with passionate intensity. ... As the lemmings used to say, 
see you at the cliff.

Just when you thought we were done with Dynamo Dave: Evidently, whacking the 
poor and the disabled wasn't enough for our least favorite ex-pilot. The next 
day, David Agema, who also chairs a House appropriations subcommittee, voted to 
stick it to his own governor (and the rest of us), sabotage the new 
international river bridge and stand with the odious Matty Moroun.


The governor, solidly behind the new bridge, wanted to balance the budget with 
some of the money Canada is offering to cover our share of funding the new 
bridge. Agema and his soulmate, state Sen. John Pappageorge of Troy, said no. 
They want to use "toll credits" from existing bridges (the Ambassador, natch) 
for some of the transportation budget — and get the rest by cutting funding for 
public bus systems. This must have been especially appealing, since they get to 
simultaneously suck up to a billionaire and make life more miserable for the 
poor.


However, it isn't clear if it is legal; Moroun thinks he has "toll credits" 
that he can transfer to the state to be used instead of the Canadian money as 
matching funds for federal highway money.


But the legality is totally unclear, and in any event, Moroun's credits are 
worth far less than the Canadian offer of $550 million, which Washington has 
already said can be used as matching funds to get four times as much to fix our 
roads.


So how did Agema and Pappageorge justify this? "We don't have a [new] bridge," 
said Pappageorge. Irrelevant, but it does have a nice ring. What he probably 
meant was that the Legislature still might do Moroun's bidding and kill the new 
bridge.


Top Gun Dave decided to display his knowledge as an international statesman. He 
said the Canadian funds weren't a sure thing because Canada is having a 
national election May 2.


That's totally wrong, of course; Canada's major parties both support what the 
governor prefers to call the new international river crossing. But then, only 
secular humanists worry about facts.

http://metrotimes.com/columns/headed-off-the-cliff-1.1134823

We live in a trailer on the outskirts of town
You never see us 'cause we don't come around
We've got 25 rifles just to keep the population down...
I've got the revolution blues
I see bloody fountains
And ten million dune buggies
Comin' down the mountain
- Neil Young, "Revolution Blues"

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to