He is against the wars. That's why I am supporting him: to undermine the pro-war consensus in the Republican Party, which is a key obstacle to efforts to end the wars.
If Ron Paul Wins Iowa, Antiwar Democrats and Independents Likely to Provide Margin of Victory http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/if-ron-paul-wins-iowa-ant_b_1165423.html Will the Media Let Ron Paul Question U.S. Foreign Policy? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/ron-paul-foreign-policy_b_1151442.html On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:48 PM, raghu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Robert Naiman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> This Ron Paul: >> >> Ron Paul: Drug War In U.S. Has Racist Origins >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/27/ron-paul-drugs-drug-war_n_1170878.html > > > > Seriously? A reference to the connection between race and the "war on > drugs" is supposed to cancel out all those vile newsletters? > > I can understand why a progressive might support a populist like Ralph > Nader. But Ron fucking Paul? The most charitable thing you can say > about Paul is that he is a kook. > > http://www.mrdestructo.com/2011/12/game-over-scans-of-over-50-ron-paul.html > > -raghu. > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l -- Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
