Well, indeed, and what I am doing is not actually campaigning for him, but using him as a hook to push an antiwar agenda.
Ryan Grim did the same thing in his piece in Huffington Post which I forwarded. The piece isn't about Ron Paul at all. It's about the drug war. The piece starts out: Ron Paul says the drug war is racist. Is that true? Let's investigate...and off it goes. On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Max Sawicky <[email protected]> wrote: > If it's not too zen for y'all, supporting Paul is not really supporting > Paul. > He isn't going to be president. The most visible stuff about him is the > themes of anti-war, anti-drug-war, and cancel the rest of government. The > latter isn't going to happen, while the first two are pretty popular. So in > my view by all means talk them up. That doesn't prevent anyone for noting > the genuinely wacky, less visible stuff in his platform, as well as the vile > material in his newsletters. He's being made out to be David Duke, but Duke > campaigned on racism. Paul does not. > > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
