Jim wrote: > I don't accept the Shaikh-Mandel-et al dogma that capitalism suffers > from a secular fall in the rate of profit, so I don't see how that's > relevant.
Jim, Would some empirical evidence persuade you? The secular falling rate of profit may be the only tenet of Marxism that bourgeois economics deems uncontroversial. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
