What evidence? It depends on your starting and end points. J. Devine On May 3, 2012 6:35 PM, "Julio Huato" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jim wrote: > > > I don't accept the Shaikh-Mandel-et al dogma that capitalism suffers > > from a secular fall in the rate of profit, so I don't see how that's > > relevant. > > Jim, > > Would some empirical evidence persuade you? > > The secular falling rate of profit may be the only tenet of Marxism > that bourgeois economics deems uncontroversial. > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
