yes. Economic theory is more of grease for the wheels rather than being an engine.
Michael Nuwer wrote: > But... Do you think that the models were the "engine" of the change, as > the book title suggests? The development of Taylorism was an important > element in the transformation of 20th century manufacturing, but it was, > I would argue, a response to the needs of capital at that time. If > capital after 1970 had different needs than they in fact had, then maybe > these models would have been ignored(?) -- Jim Devine / If you're going to support the lesser of two evils, you should at least know the nature of that evil. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
