On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote:
> The article defends the adjuncts, not the tenured. There are good (if > self.-interested) arguments for the latter to support the former: if the > substitutes for the tenured are more expensive to hire... > Yeah, like the Tea Partiers who oppose immigration because they love low-income black people and worry for their jobs. -raghu.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
