"raghu" <[email protected]> wrote: > I was referring of course to the Weberian concept of the protestant > work ethic as a driving force for capitalism. ...
Return on investment (or is it capital) is the driving force for capitalism. There is no work ethic for the owners of capital. > What is the Marxist take on this phenomenon of long and grueling working > hours on Wall St? ... When the markets close, not many are working. > My understanding is that Marxism does not assign a lot of weight to > sociological explanations of events and phenomena. > In my opinion that is a weakness of that ideology. A theory isn't an ideology. There is no need to complicate Marx's economic theory. -- Ron
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
