What categories? Categories change and the context of those categories matter.  
For argument's sake compare a janitor's life in the US with an Indian 'sweeper' 
today (equivalent category, but not really because of context). See who might 
be mobile and under what conditions?


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Chair & Professor of Contemporary Indian Studies
Australia India Institute and School of Social & Political Sciences
University of Melbourne
147-149 Barry Street, Carlton VIC 3053, AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61 3 9035 6161
Visit the Australia India Institute Website http://www.aii.unimelb.edu.au/ 

Recent Conference (The Land Question)
http://idsk.edu.in/program.php
New Book Series (Dynamics of Asian Development)
http://www.springer.com/series/13342

Recent books:
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198082286.do#.UI5Wzmc2dI0
http://www.oup.com/localecatalogue/cls_academic/?i=9780199646210
http://www.anthempress.com/pdf/9780857285041.pdf
http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?pid=295354
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 26, 2014, at 20:14, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Mobility is not relevant to inequality. It merely refers to the movement of
> individuals from one category to another, leaving the categories unchanged.
> 
> At one time an 8th-grade education was more than enough for an individual to
> "move up"; but the number of people up and the number of people down
> remained the same.
> 
> The topic is the ratio of the "top groups" to the "lowest groups," not
> whether individuals shuffle around.
> 
> Carrol
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:40 PM
> To: Progressive Economics
> Subject: Re: [Pen-l] NYT column on Piketty book "Capital in the Twenty-First
> Century"
> 
> 
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 10:36 PM, "Perelman, Michael" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> The education question is a conundrum.  Education is almost a requirement
> for social mobility 
> 
> But if 'mobility' is the answer -- what was the question, again? 
> 
> 
> Michael Smith
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to