Yep. That was Ira Steward's argument. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I have followed Tom Walker's arguments correctly, it may start out that > way, 4 day's pay for 4 day's work, but will not stay there. Wages will > rise > _at least_ to present level, and probably go higher. > > Anything that impacts on the availability of the "reserve army of labor" is > threatening to capitalism. > > Carrol > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Louis Proyect > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:49 PM > To: Progressive Economics > Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Russia considers - following ILO essay == the 4 Day > week > > On 10/7/14 6:33 PM, Eugene Coyle wrote: > > > > http://en.ria.ru/society/20141007/193775058/Russian-Parliament-to-Mull-Four- > Day-Work-Week-Cut-Hours-.html > > It is safe to assume that they would get 4 days pay for 4 days work. > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
