There is often a case that can be made up front about "30 for 40" but "30 for 30" has a much, much better chance than "40 for 40" does of evolving into "30 for 40." Sectarians will righteously sacrifice a principle to uphold a slogan.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Tom Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep. That was Ira Steward's argument. > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If I have followed Tom Walker's arguments correctly, it may start out that >> way, 4 day's pay for 4 day's work, but will not stay there. Wages will >> rise >> _at least_ to present level, and probably go higher. >> >> Anything that impacts on the availability of the "reserve army of labor" >> is >> threatening to capitalism. >> >> Carrol >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Louis Proyect >> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:49 PM >> To: Progressive Economics >> Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Russia considers - following ILO essay == the 4 Day >> week >> >> On 10/7/14 6:33 PM, Eugene Coyle wrote: >> > >> >> http://en.ria.ru/society/20141007/193775058/Russian-Parliament-to-Mull-Four- >> Day-Work-Week-Cut-Hours-.html >> <http://en.ria.ru/society/20141007/193775058/Russian-Parliament-to-Mull-Four-Day-Work-Week-Cut-Hours-.html> >> >> It is safe to assume that they would get 4 days pay for 4 days work. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pen-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pen-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Tom Walker (Sandwichman) > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
