Hinrich,
Of those 4 points, confronting the humanitarian crisis, restarting the
economy, and regaining employment are anti-austerity aspects I was
talking about. Galbraith does not deal with the agreement of the past
days regarding any of these aspects except the humanitarian crisis,
which he evaluates favorably.
To ignore the other aspects of anti-austerity, namely, restarting the
economy and regaining employment, (deepening democracy and tax justice
are means, not ends), is what I mean his support amounting to a apology
for the government negotiating outcome. To be 'critical' in the good
sense of the word regarding the outcome for anti-austerity in its full
range is to be objective and non-apologetic.
Paul Zarembka
Syriza run its campaign on these four pillars:
1st: Confronting the humanitarian crisis
2nd: Restarting the economy and promoting tax justice
3rd: Regaining employment
4th: Transforming the political system to deepen democracy
http://www.syriza.gr/article/id/59907/SYRIZA---THE-THESSALONIKI-PROGRAMME.html#.VO8j5I6LKT0
Which of these goals are permanently blocked by the prelimanary outcome of the
the Eurogroup-Greek government negotiations?
What do you mean by "apology"?
Your judgment sounds a bit apodictically.
Hnrich Kuhls
--
==== */Research in Political Economy/
<http://www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?issn=0161-7230>* (since 1977) |
*Editor's webpage <http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/%7Ezarembka>*
/*Sraffa and Althusser Reconsidered; Neoliberalism Advancing*/ (2014)
/*Contradictions: Finance, Greed, and Labor Unequally Paid*/ (2013)
/*Revitalizing Marxist Theory for Today's Capitalism*/ (2011) with R. Desai
/*The Hidden History of 9-11
<http://www.sevenstories.com/book/?GCOI=58322100606640>*/ (2nd ed.,
Seven Stories Press)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
