Syriza’s performance in office is no more complex than that of so many other 
governments backed by unions and social movements who were quickly forced to 
abandon their programs as a condition of governing a capitalist state. Syriza’s 
was a more dramatic fall given the depth of the crisis in Greece, the high 
hopes it’s electoral victory engendered, and its subsequent flight from the 
renewed anti-austerity mandate handed to it in the referendum, but it’s record 
was not so extraordinary and difficult to understand as Louis likes to make out.

The Syriza leadership, including Varoufakis, acted on the assumption that could 
widen what it saw as an incipient split within the European bourgeoisie and 
governments - on the one side, the French and Italians who considered that 
austerity had reached its limits, and on the other, the Germans and their 
allies who made aid conditional on the completion of structural reforms in 
labour and product markets. This was a disastrous strategic miscalculation 
which turned Syriza away from continued mobilization and education of its own 
anti-austerity base in favour of futile and dispiriting cap in hand appeals for 
relief from the German-led creditors’ troika. 

The more realistic approach - suggested by many commentators, and not only on 
the left - would have been to admit the possibility of failure and, if it came 
to that, to try to negotiate an orderly exit from the eurozone. Schauble, in 
particular, was unhappy about throwing good money after bad, and was 
encouraging a Greek “suspension” from the Eurozone. This would necessarily have 
been an orderly exit since it was and is not in the interest of the US and 
Europeans to starve and destabilize Greece to the point it becomes a failed 
state at a strategic global crossroads. 

It became clear early on that the truly utopian notion was that the Germans, in 
concert with the IMF and ECB, would agree to substantial debt relief without 
Syriza implementing the deregulation, fiscal discipline, privatization, and 
other measures that previous Greek governments and other eurozone debtors had 
accepted. The troika was as conscious of the “demonstration effect” of the 
Greek negotiations throughout Europe as the hopeful European left which hoped 
to emulate a Syriza victory in Spain and elsewhere.

Short of being able to negotiate an orderly and viable Grexit, it would have 
been better for the Syriza government to have resigned and continued to 
patiently organize and educate from opposition rather than sign on to the 
harshest austerity package to date. If Syriza’s accession to office last 
January was marked by enthusiasm and hope, it’s post-capitulation re-election 
in September was characterized by resigned support for the party as a “lesser 
evil” and an illusionary hope born of desperation that it could still mitigate 
the worst effects of the new agreement. 

It confuses cause and effect to blame the ostensibly more “conservative” Greek 
and European masses for the government’s behaviour. It never tried to give a 
lead to the most combative sectors of the growing anti-austerity sentiment 
sweeping Europe, and its swift and unprincipled capitulation in defiance of the 
July referendum vote confused, demoralized, and split those who had once looked 
to the party for inspiration. The net effect of the Syriza experience, as has 
been the case with all left-centre governments administering a capitalist 
state, was to halt the forward movement of the mass of the population yearning 
for change. 

If the fear is that more radical measures pointing to socialist revolution 
inevitably produce catastrophic results in a small country with a weak and 
undeveloped economy, then the question must be asked: Why form or elect parties 
like Syriza which promise sweeping social change in the first place? Arguably, 
the Greek masses would not have been exposed to the same economic subversion 
and hardship perpetrated by the troika had they not had the temerity to reject 
its favoured parties, PASOK and New Democracy, in favour of one which sought to 
tear up the austerity memoranda they had signed.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to