[Yet another domain exemplifying the desperate avoidance of the p-p collapse]


http://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2016/02/11/emerging-payment-systems-and-the-primacy-of-private-law/



Payment systems now stand in an era of rapid technological change 
typified by two streams of innovation: mobile payments (such as Apple 
Pay) and cryptographic virtual currencies (most prominently Bitcoin). 
Apple Pay builds its payment structure on top of existing ecosystems, 
serving as a conduit for payments by credit card, debit card, and ACH. 
The end-user legal protections in TILA and EFTA for the underlying 
payments do not, however, obviously apply to the mobile payment overlay 
uncontemplated at the time of the 1970s adoptions. This situation raises
 questions about the scope and applicability of those protections when 
mobile device hardware or software is the cause-in-fact of unauthorized 
payments. Even further outside of existing legal ecosystems are 
cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin, for instance, not only can exchange monetary 
value outside the existing paradigm of legal tender, but its use of 
“blockchain” technology and a distributed network as a verification 
system means that it can dispense with the need for trusted 
institutional intermediaries.[8] The once unthinkable is now 
possible—electronic payments without banks in the middle.

Do the lessons of the last fifty years of payments law and technology
 hold any lessons for a foreseeable future of developments that were 
once as unforeseeable as mobile payments and cryptocurrency? In this paper,
 I argue that they do. Payment systems have now clearly exceeded the 
regulatory capacity of public legal institutions to govern them via a 
comprehensive code like the UCC. Public law protection of the end user, 
however, has proven so successful and facilitated such industry growth 
that complete privatization of payments law is not the best response 
either. Emerging payment systems should be subject to a division between
 private law and public law in which private law is predominant, but not
 exclusive.
                                          
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to