Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Bill Totten <shimog...@ashisuto.co.jp>
> Date: March 25, 2016 at 11:59:03 PM EDT
> To: Ugly New World <uglynewwo...@lists.mcgill.ca>, a-list 
> <a-l...@lists.riseup.net>
> Subject: [a-list] Is the "Gig Economy" Here to Stay?
> Reply-To: shimog...@ashisuto.co.jp
> 
> by Dean Baker
> 
> CounterPunch (March 21 2016)
> 
> The "gig economy" is one of the many trendy revolutions capturing the news 
> media's attention. But some simple realities apply to the gig economy, buried 
> in a great deal of hype.
> 
> "Gig economy" work is the same sort of casual labor that has always existed. 
> It's a variation on the day-labor centers where workers go in the morning in 
> the hope of finding work for all or part of a day. The only difference is 
> that the gig economy operates over the Internet and involves workers in a 
> wider range of occupations, some relatively skilled. However, just as some 
> day-labor companies hope to profit by evading regulations and cheating 
> workers, many gig economy companies hope to legally skirt labor laws that 
> apply to other employers.
> 
> The survival of gig economy companies depends on the overall state of the 
> economy. It is no accident that the gig economy exploded following the recent 
> steep recession. More than eight years after the onset of the recession, the 
> economy is still down more than three million jobs from trend levels.
> 
> If we pursue policies designed to weaken the labor market, such as higher 
> interest rates from the Federal Reserve Board, we likely will continue to see 
> large numbers of workers desperate for employment from Uber, TaskRabbit and 
> other gig economy companies. In a bad economy, irregular work is better than 
> no work.
> 
> The survival of the gig economy also depends on whether governments will 
> apply labor laws to gig economy companies. There is no reason Uber should be 
> exempt from minimum wage laws, overtime regulations and workers' compensation 
> coverage. If the company's claim is true - that compliance is too difficult 
> to figure out - then companies that are more adept with technology will 
> outcompete Uber. But if gig economy companies are exempt from rules that 
> apply to their competitors, gig companies will be allowed to thrive in a very 
> weak labor market.
> 
> Of course, there is a place for the type of casual labor that fills gig 
> economy advocates' stories. There are people who would like to earn some 
> extra money in their spare time. If gig economy companies can provide more 
> opportunities for such work, that would be great. But there is no reason this 
> cannot be done in a way that complies with existing labor laws.
> 
> _____
> 
> This column originally appeared in CQ Researcher: http://library.cqpress.com/
> 
> http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/21/80875/
> 
> https://billtotten.wordpress.com/
> http://www.ashisuto.co.jp
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to