http://news.ft.com/cms/s/6be27ed0-89da-11d9-aa18-00000e2511c8.html
Wolfowitz on shortlist for World Bank top post
By Andrew Balls and Edward Alden in Washington
Published: March 1 2005 00:43 | Last updated: March 1 2005 00:43

Paul WolfowitzPaul Wolfowitz, US deputy secretary of defence, has emerged as
a leading candidate to replace James Wolfensohn as the president of the
World Bank.

Mr Wolfowitz is one of a small number of people being considered for the US
nomination, administration insiders said.

The nomination of Mr Wolfowitz, one of the chief architects of the Iraq war
and a former US ambassador to Indonesia, would likely be highly
controversial, and could raise new questions about the process by which the
World Bank chief is selected. One administration official said his
nomination "would have enormous repercussions within the development
community".

Others on the US shortlist include Randall Tobias, former head of Eli Lilly
and the administration's co-ordinator on Aids.

Leadership of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund is decided by
all the shareholders in the institutions. But the US and Europe in effect
divide up the top jobs, with an American heading the bank and a European
running the fund.

The effort to pick the US candidate has been led by the White House National
Security Council and the Council of Economic Advisers. The Treasury is
leading consultations with other World Bank shareholders. Asked about Mr
Wolfowitz's possible nomination, Rob Nichols, Treasury spokesman, said: "We
don't speculate on personnel appointments before they are made."

Other names on the US list are John Taylor, the top Treasury official for
international affairs, and Peter McPherson, president of Michigan State
University. But they are not seen by the administration as leading
candidates.

European officials point to the dispute over Caio Koch-Weser a candidate for
the IMF post favoured by Europe but blocked by the US as setting a precedent
that could see them veto the US nominee. Developing countries have also
demanded a greater say in the selection.

Reply via email to